Liverpool should push the boat out and sign Harry Kane to battle Erling Haaland’s coup from Man City, and one critic has explained why it’s not as strange as you think.
Man City is on its way to winning its fourth domestic title in five years. Liverpool were their biggest rival during that time, breaking City’s dominance to win their first Premier League title of the 2019/20 season.
However, never resting on their laurels under Pep Guardiola, City will prepare to become even stronger next year.
In fact, Borussia Dortmund striker Erling Haaland is on his way to honoring the Premier League. Details of the City coup – including the complete financial meltdown of the deal – It can be found here.
Transportation expert Fabrizio Romano recently revealed how Liverpool Planning to respond to Haaland’s news. Trusted Journalist Four separate plans that will shape their summer, despite insisting their transfer policy will continue to focus on “smart deals”.
In other words, the Reds will maintain their approach to signing players entering their early years who have a point to prove.
But according to analyst Tony Cascarino, Liverpool must fight fire with fire and break the bank for Harry Kane.
The Tottenham striker endured a slow start to the season, although he has since regained his best form.
Kane was once again praised for his abilities in the gaming industry and was instrumental in helping Son Heung-min to challenge the Golden Boot. At the time of publication, the South Korean national team was just one target behind Mohamed Salah in their scoring charts.
Kane has been the subject of intense speculation linking him to a move to the Federation last summer. But Spurs captain Daniel Levy remained resolute, and Haaland’s impending arrival closed that door forever.
Now, Cascarino referenced the move when he explained why Liverpool should pounce. As explained why Tottenham The spell might actually want to leave and why the Reds is his only option.
Kane’s future depends on the Champions League?
“Signing Harry Kane would be the perfect way for Liverpool to respond to City’s takeover of Haaland,” he said. Cascarino Books in The Times.
“Tottenham Hotspur are set to finish outside the Champions League places and if that happens it is unlikely Kane will want to stay for another year.
“The England talisman cannot go to City because of Haaland’s move. Manchester United is not an option because they will miss the Champions League. Chelsea already has Romelu Lukaku.
“This makes Liverpool the only suitable destination for Kane – and he would be a perfect fit for Klopp’s squad.”
Harry Kane to Liverpool – Could that happen?
Reportedly, City saw several bids north of the £100m buyout for Kane last summer.
Even if his value has diminished somewhat as he has moved on by a year and with 12 months less on his contract, it is likely that the move will still require a new club record for Liverpool.
Virgil van Dijk was 26 years old when his current record of £75m was set. By the time next season starts, Kane will be 29 years old.
Liverpool’s owners have shown that they are ready to step in when the right man is available. However, Kane’s move is meaningless to our eyes.
Arguably Liverpool have been at their best this season when Sadio Mane worked centrally. With Luis Diaz’ win over Merseyside, Mane could find himself in the middle quite often next year.
On top of that, Spurs are heading in the right direction under Antonio Conte and Kane appears to have settled in again. And if Tottenham reform Arsenal and qualify for the Champions League, the chances of Kane leaving will be practically nil.